Monday, September 1, 2008
The virtual body and the cyborized mind
“From Frankenstein to the Visible Human Project, the body is continually reinterpreted as a limit to what it means to be human.”
In this day and age the definition of ‘human’ is changing at a rapid rate. Through technology the human form has been augmented and enhanced in so many ways that it begs the question of where human stops and technology begins. To examine this idea I have to first address how we define human. Is human defined through a body, through emotions or is it through intelligence? If a machine possesses all these qualities can they too be considered human? By examining the implications of technology and its effects on the body and mind (which are undeniably linked) and then moving on to study the evolution of man to machine and machine to man I found that the line that divides human and machine is not as defined as we might think.
Over the Horizon: Potential Impact of Emerging Trends in Information and Communication Technology on Disability Policy and Practice
This executive summary follows the emerging trends of technology and its impact on people with disabilities. The summary covers how technology is evolving by becoming smaller and more powerful and explores new trends such as virtual reality/ies and intelligent assistance technology (AT). ‘A potential for new “intelligent AT” is emerging that was previously not possible. Translating and transforming technologies will be able to take information that is not perceivable or understandable to many with sensory or cognitive impairments, and render it into a form that they can use.’ However, while the summary looks at the potential new and more powerful technology can have, it also makes attention of issues, barriers and concerns regarding the pace and evolution of technology. The summary leads to the conclusion that technology generally favours the UN-impaired (whether mentally or physically) and people able to afford access to computers and the internet. Additionally the article voices concerns about the rapid mainstream turn over of a technology that mean neither assistive technology nor government policy can keep up with the ever changing pace. The summary goes on to list suggested actions that can/and should be taken to ease the stress and ensure fair access for disabled (physically, mentally, and financially) people.
Haptic Interfaces and Devices
This article covers the idea of Haptic devices, by using analogies of a computer, mouse and user to explain how the technology works, and its current and potential uses. Essentially Haptic devices operate by simulating feedback from a machine or computer to its user through touch. The low-end and most recognisable form of Haptic technology are game consuls and joysticks that vibrate in players hands. By simulating the forces of touch Haptic technology makes way for incredibly realistic virtual environments that can be used in fields such as education and training and medicine. When reading this article with the question of human limitation in mind, we can see how breakthroughs in Haptic technology could see the computer/machine becoming more and more integrated with the human body. Is it possible that one day computers and technology are no longer seen as tools, but some kind of extension of the human body? With the feedback design of Haptic technology, a computer can act as a fifth limb to the human body by crossing the boundary from virtual to physical by simulating the human nervous system like any other part of the body would.
Sony takes 3-D cinema directly to the brain
While short, this article from Times Online explores the possibility of creating a device that can transmit sensory data directly into the human brain. This means that people could watch movies or play video games without the need to interact with the physical world. ‘The first step towards a real-life version [of the Matrix], in which cyber-reality is projected into the brains of people via an electrode feed, could be just over the horizon.‘ The article claims that Sony is working on a theory in which Ultrasonic pulses to invoke a sensory response in the brain. This begs the question of how this technology could effect human lives if it was created. Could it be used for an ultra new style of video conferencing or perhaps like a telephone? And of course, it would make a huge impact in gaming and virtual realities. Would people shift into virtual spaces, and how real could they become if we could experience taste, smell, sound and visual stimuli with this technology?
How Exoskeletons Will Work.
This website has a fantastic overview of the exoskeleton idea. Most notably it is aided by pitchers and videos provided by DARPA, Discover Channel and Reuters. Of particular interest is the Land Warrior computer system video that is linked at the top of the ‘Morphing Man and Machine’ segment of the Bonsor’s article. The video examines the current Land Warrior technology that uses radio, live video and GPS to plot the location of a soldier, his comrades and enemy troops on the field. Additionally, the Land Warrior system can allow a soldier to operate weaponry without stepping in the line of fire to shoot – essentially the Land Warrior system enhances sight and hearing to allow weapons to become and extension of the human body. The exoskeleton article also has a variety of links to other similar articles on the website such as the SpringWalker Body Amplifier. However, while the article by Bonsor provides an excellent outline of what an exoskeleton is, how it augments the human form and technical challenges faced in the exoskeleton’s design, the information lacks some more complex detail of specific models and their exact capabilities and specs.
The Indimate Machine, Web Feature: Intelligent by Design
Scientific American covers a long article about A.I. and the challenges faced in developing Artificial Intelligence without getting too technical. It has several case studies of how different scientists have approached A.I. challenge. The article covers potential uses that A.I.’s could have in the future and where the technology is headed and its development. The article explains how simple things that we take for granted, such as ‘seeing, hearing and hand-eye coordination, were more difficult to write code for than the first A.I. programs [that played chess].’ It also covers some ethical and moral dilemmas and allows the reader to consider them. ‘Teams of robots […] could wage war, execute dangerous search and rescue operations, pick produce in the most efficient way, explore other planets, or even play games against teams of humans just for fun.’ While this seems perfectly innocent, the article provokes thought on the future ramifications that such a technology could have impact on how the human race defines human. If A.I. are human in all but body (i.e. not of flesh and blood), is it wrong to use them as expendable persons and war fodder?
Conclusion:
We are in the process of being assimilated. Human and machine can no longer be thought of as separate entities, but one and the same. Through the constant development and evolution of technology the human body can no longer be considered purely flesh and blood. Thus our ability to define ourselves by our bodies is lost. Should we then, relinquish our claims of humanity and consider ourselves machines? Or can we define our humanity through our ability to think and feel? What then of Artifical Intelligence? Ironically it is by agumenting the body with technology that humans could soon have the potentiual to separate mind from body by will alone. The possibilty that the human body could be lost all together suggests that with the current changes and evolution of technology there is no dividing limit to what is human and what is machine. The limit to being human is something that will continue to expand to encompass both humans and technology.
Bibliography
Bonsor, Kevin. ‘How Exoskeletons Will Work.’ HowStuffWorks.com, 07 February 2001. <http://science.howstuffworks.com/exoskeleton.htm> 17 August 2008
John R. Vaughn, ‘Over the Horizon: Potential Impact of Emerging Trends in Information and Communication Technology on Disability Policy and Practice’, National Council on Disability, December 19 2006, http://www.ncd.gov/, available at: <http://www.ncd.gov/newsroom/publications/2006/emerging_trends.htm> 25 August 2008
Hayward, Vincent. Astley, Oilver R. Cruz-Hernadez, Manuel. Grant, Danny and Robles-De-La-Torre, Gabreiel. ‘Haptic Interfaces and Devices’, Sensor Review, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2004, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, available online <http://www.roblesdelatorre.com/gabriel/VH-OA-MC-DG-GR-04.pdf> 22 August 2008
Horsnell, Michael. ‘Sony takes 3-D cinema directly to the brain’, The Times Online April 7, 2005,available at: <http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article378077.ece> 22 August 2008
Mitchell, Jacqueline S., The Indimate Machine, Web Feature: Intelligent by Design. Scientific American Frontiers, October 22, 2002, available at: <http://www.pbs.org/saf/1303/features/AI.htm> 25 August 2008
Annotated Webliography Q3
Question 3 : Judy Waczman argues that Donna Haraway's figure of the cyborg has taken on ‘a life of its own’ in popular culture, science fiction and academic writing. In what ways has it been taken up by feminists?
Many researchers have long debated Donna Haraway’s concept of the cyborg. I started my research on Haraway by looking it up on Wikipedia and found a lot of keywords such as cyber feminism, cyborg, gender and etc. Let me begin by first defining what a cyborg is in dictionary terms. It is a person whose physiological functioning is aided by or dependent upon a mechanical or electronic device. But according to Haraway’s term, she defines the cyborg as "a cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction"(CM, 149).
Below here are the following articles that helped with answering the guiding question that I found useful:
1. Krista Scott, "The Cyborg, the Scientist, the Feminist & Her Critic",
This is a very detailed reading on Haraway’s vision of the cyborg. It’s an interesting critique as the thoughts on the concept and in particular with Marxism theory. There are also problems of cyborg politics upon feminist identities; in which the author challenges some kind of self-adaptation.
2. Donna Haraway, "A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century," in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature.
This essay showcases Haraway’s argument is introduced as "an effort to build an ironic political myth faithful to feminism, socialism, and materialism" (CM, 149). She claims blasphemy and irony as her vantage tools. Blasphemy invokes the seriousness of the stance she adopts, as well as her distancing from the moral majority without breaking with the idea of community and connectivity, and "irony is about contradictions that do not resolve into larger wholes, even dialectically, about the tension of holding incompatible things together because both or all are necessary and true... It is also a rhetorical strategy and a political method" (CM, 149).
3. Chela Sandoval, "New Sciences: Cyborg Feminism and the Methodology of the Oppressed." In The Cyborg Handbook, ed. Chris Hables Gray.
This article introduces some pretty good arguments and shows the disputes on Haraway’s concept of the cyborg and the ideas that follows it. Sandoval further develops Haraway’s notion and applies the cyborg metaphor for various marginalized groups in the States. The author considers the cyborg theory would also be fundamental for fields out of feminism. This example illustrates the fact that Haraways’s cyborg has taken a life of its own.
4. Steven Dixon, “Metal Gender”
This is an interesting piece that shows how the author disagrees with Haraway’s idea of the cyborg. The reading points out many factors such as Haraway’s ‘treatment of gender is self-contradictory and unconvincing’ from what has been written in the Manifesto. He then proposes ‘metal gender’ but not the ‘gender-blinded’ cyborg of Haraway as the cyborg imposes serious strains upon the binary classification system Bourdieu defines ("a fundamental principle of ... two complementary classes"), as well as on ideas of separations which operate within and against "the network of biological kinship".
5. Hari Kunzru, “You are a Cyborg”
This commentary by Hari Kunzru discusses the notion of the cyborg based on Haraway's ‘Cyborg Manifesto’. Feminists everywhere have grasped on the prospects that both men and women can all be restructured if they are not normal but are constructed, like a cyborg.
In conclusion, having done a lot of research on this topic has been a great introduction into understanding feminism, cyborgs and so much more. It definitely has revealed a lot in the overall feminist thinking on Donna Haraway's concept of the cyborg. However, it is still very highly-debatable but no doubt; there has been heaps of significant findings and an eye-opener to Haraway’s figure of the cyborg.
Bibliography:
Scott, Krista (1997). The Cyborg, the Scientist, the Feminist & Her Critic.
The Feminist eZine - Modern Feminism
http://www.feministezine.com/feminist/philosophy/cyborg-scientist-feminist.html
Haraway, Donna (1991). "A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century," in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature.
http://www.egs.edu/faculty/haraway/haraway-a-cyborg-manifesto.html
Sandoval, Chela (1995). "New Sciences: Cyborg Feminism and the Methodology of the Oppressed." In The Cyborg Handbook, ed. Chris Hables Gray. New York: Routledge.
http://www.stumptuous.com/comps/sandoval.html
Dixon, Steve (2003). ‘Metal Gender’.
http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=384
Kunzru, Hari (1994). “You are Cyborg”, Wired Magazine, 5.02,
http://www.wired.com/wired/archives/5.02/ffharaway_pr.html
Many researchers have long debated Donna Haraway’s concept of the cyborg. I started my research on Haraway by looking it up on Wikipedia and found a lot of keywords such as cyber feminism, cyborg, gender and etc. Let me begin by first defining what a cyborg is in dictionary terms. It is a person whose physiological functioning is aided by or dependent upon a mechanical or electronic device. But according to Haraway’s term, she defines the cyborg as "a cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction"(CM, 149).
Below here are the following articles that helped with answering the guiding question that I found useful:
1. Krista Scott, "The Cyborg, the Scientist, the Feminist & Her Critic",
This is a very detailed reading on Haraway’s vision of the cyborg. It’s an interesting critique as the thoughts on the concept and in particular with Marxism theory. There are also problems of cyborg politics upon feminist identities; in which the author challenges some kind of self-adaptation.
2. Donna Haraway, "A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century," in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature.
This essay showcases Haraway’s argument is introduced as "an effort to build an ironic political myth faithful to feminism, socialism, and materialism" (CM, 149). She claims blasphemy and irony as her vantage tools. Blasphemy invokes the seriousness of the stance she adopts, as well as her distancing from the moral majority without breaking with the idea of community and connectivity, and "irony is about contradictions that do not resolve into larger wholes, even dialectically, about the tension of holding incompatible things together because both or all are necessary and true... It is also a rhetorical strategy and a political method" (CM, 149).
3. Chela Sandoval, "New Sciences: Cyborg Feminism and the Methodology of the Oppressed." In The Cyborg Handbook, ed. Chris Hables Gray.
This article introduces some pretty good arguments and shows the disputes on Haraway’s concept of the cyborg and the ideas that follows it. Sandoval further develops Haraway’s notion and applies the cyborg metaphor for various marginalized groups in the States. The author considers the cyborg theory would also be fundamental for fields out of feminism. This example illustrates the fact that Haraways’s cyborg has taken a life of its own.
4. Steven Dixon, “Metal Gender”
This is an interesting piece that shows how the author disagrees with Haraway’s idea of the cyborg. The reading points out many factors such as Haraway’s ‘treatment of gender is self-contradictory and unconvincing’ from what has been written in the Manifesto. He then proposes ‘metal gender’ but not the ‘gender-blinded’ cyborg of Haraway as the cyborg imposes serious strains upon the binary classification system Bourdieu defines ("a fundamental principle of ... two complementary classes"), as well as on ideas of separations which operate within and against "the network of biological kinship".
5. Hari Kunzru, “You are a Cyborg”
This commentary by Hari Kunzru discusses the notion of the cyborg based on Haraway's ‘Cyborg Manifesto’. Feminists everywhere have grasped on the prospects that both men and women can all be restructured if they are not normal but are constructed, like a cyborg.
In conclusion, having done a lot of research on this topic has been a great introduction into understanding feminism, cyborgs and so much more. It definitely has revealed a lot in the overall feminist thinking on Donna Haraway's concept of the cyborg. However, it is still very highly-debatable but no doubt; there has been heaps of significant findings and an eye-opener to Haraway’s figure of the cyborg.
Bibliography:
Scott, Krista (1997). The Cyborg, the Scientist, the Feminist & Her Critic.
The Feminist eZine - Modern Feminism
http://www.feministezine.com/feminist/philosophy/cyborg-scientist-feminist.html
Haraway, Donna (1991). "A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century," in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature.
http://www.egs.edu/faculty/haraway/haraway-a-cyborg-manifesto.html
Sandoval, Chela (1995). "New Sciences: Cyborg Feminism and the Methodology of the Oppressed." In The Cyborg Handbook, ed. Chris Hables Gray. New York: Routledge.
http://www.stumptuous.com/comps/sandoval.html
Dixon, Steve (2003). ‘Metal Gender’.
http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=384
Kunzru, Hari (1994). “You are Cyborg”, Wired Magazine, 5.02,
http://www.wired.com/wired/archives/5.02/ffharaway_pr.html
assignment 1 - guiding question 2
2. “From Frankenstein to the Visible Human Project, the body is continually reinterpreted as a limit to what it means to be a human.” Discuss critically.
To discuss and address this question critically, the response would likely have to address several important questions…
Does the act of radically exceeding the basic capabilities of the human body make a person less human? How has the body been continually reinterpreted, and in the eyes of society, has ‘what it means to be human’ changed? Is modern medicine and science taking humanity to posthumanity? Is it possible to be human without a body? Through transhumanism, does mankind risk losing it’s humanity entirely?
These are all questions that flash into my mind, and are ones which I would hope to investigate inside an actual response to the essay question. Obviously, this would require detailed research into the range of topics surrounding trans/post/humanism, identity and technology. The following are five different sources that I would likely use to aid and support my critical discussion of the question.
Nick Bostrom appeared frequently in my search for high quality research, and for good reason. His paper, In Defence of Posthuman Dignity, evaluates the arguments between transhumanists and bioconservatives in fairly great detail, while still using clear and easily understood language. It underlines the difficulties faced by transhumanists in making the argument that becoming cyborgs/post human is not an attack, but rather is ‘compatible and complementary’ to humanity. Sources are like these are invaluable because so often others appear to use difficult and complicated language in their discussion to appear more sophisticated. The source is of scholarly origin and is of a high standard, featuring a detailed reference list.
K. Mark Smith has written an interesting paper that confronts three popular arguments against posthuman enhancements, while noting the pitfalls of these arguments and essentially providing posthuman counter-counter arguments. This is important in the critical response to the statement as a person needs to have an idea of several different arguments to make a fair response. Smith’s engagement of those arguments makes it particularly valuable to my engagement of the essay. Of similar style to Bostrom’s article, it is written in relatively clear language, which is so essential in opening the debate to a wide audience and keeping the potentially complicated arguments simple. Smith’s paper is also well sourced and of scholarly origin, confirming it as a high value source.
Anthony Tongen writes an interesting article on biological computers and if they will ever advance to the stage of being considered human. Tongen has made the point that should scientists accurately ‘map’ the neural and chemical processes of the brain, the technology already exists to build computers operating the same processes. Clearly this article would be a valuable source in responding to the essay question because it helps raise the point that, at least physically, even the most advanced parts of the human body will likely ‘soon’ be able to be reproduced in computers. Will this lead to the creation of a ‘human’ AI? Probably not, given the difficult ethics, but the source is still valuable in exploring these issues. Tongen’s article is not perfect however, as there are some elements that lower the value of the source. The source is becoming dated, being around five years old. Furthermore, Tongen does not include an extensive bibliography in his article, referencing only a few sources.
Andy Miah’s paper argues that transhumanism has so far lacked mainstream support not because it isn’t applicable, but because of the difficulty of applying it in our cautious technological society. He goes on to make that point that the one area in which it has been acceptable in society so far is professional sport. This is important because it raises the point that the nature of elite sports is to push (and perhaps go beyond) the capabilities of the human body. What then, when athletes are no longer entirely human? This paper is clearly of relevance to the essay statement and being of a well-researched scholarly nature, is a high value source.
Although Daniel Nalesnik is not a fully accomplished academic, his paper is still well researched and quite useful in critically responding to the essay question. Naelsnik the views and opinions of several prominent thinkers in the area of posthumanity, such as Fukuyama, Clark, Brooks, McKibbin and Kurzweil. This paper is a great starting point to discover what are the major concerns and themes surrounding posthumanism are, which is of relevance to ‘what it means to be human’. His paper is well sourced and hosted on an academic website, lending it credibility.
Hopefully from the brief webliography above, one can see that any essay critically addressing the statement that ‘From Frankenstein to the Visible Human Project, the body is continually reinterpreted as a limit to what it means to be human’ would be well placed to make a reasonable response. Though I have noted a general swing towards transhumanist views in my sources, the sources above are fairly balanced themselves, making this a smaller problem. If there wasn’t the limit of 5 sources available online, I would have liked to include more sources from the humanist point of view. As it stands, I believe this webliography is a good base from which to firstly form a response, and secondly use as a base for further reading, such that one might be able to critically respond to the essay statement.
references
Bostrom, Nick (2005) In Defence of Posthuman Dignity, http://www.nickbostrom.com/ethics/dignity.html (accessed 28 August 2008)
Smith, Mark K. (2005) Saving Humanity?:
Counter-arguing Posthuman Enhancement, http://jetpress.org/volume14/smith.html (accessed 20 August 2008)
Tongen, Anthony (2003) Will Biological Computers Enable Artificially Intelligent Machines to Become Persons?, http://www.cbhd.org/resources/biotech/tongen_2003-11-07_print.htm (accessed 26 August 2008)
Miah, Andy (2003) Be Very Afraid:
Cyborg Athletes, Transhuman Ideals & Posthumanity, http://www.jetpress.org/volume13/miah.html (accessed 24 August 2008)
Nalesnik, Daniel (2005) Posthumanity: Changing Our Species, http://www.comcol.umass.edu/academics/deansbookcourse/pdfs/F05Nalesnik.pdf (accessed 23 August 2008)
To discuss and address this question critically, the response would likely have to address several important questions…
Does the act of radically exceeding the basic capabilities of the human body make a person less human? How has the body been continually reinterpreted, and in the eyes of society, has ‘what it means to be human’ changed? Is modern medicine and science taking humanity to posthumanity? Is it possible to be human without a body? Through transhumanism, does mankind risk losing it’s humanity entirely?
These are all questions that flash into my mind, and are ones which I would hope to investigate inside an actual response to the essay question. Obviously, this would require detailed research into the range of topics surrounding trans/post/humanism, identity and technology. The following are five different sources that I would likely use to aid and support my critical discussion of the question.
Nick Bostrom appeared frequently in my search for high quality research, and for good reason. His paper, In Defence of Posthuman Dignity, evaluates the arguments between transhumanists and bioconservatives in fairly great detail, while still using clear and easily understood language. It underlines the difficulties faced by transhumanists in making the argument that becoming cyborgs/post human is not an attack, but rather is ‘compatible and complementary’ to humanity. Sources are like these are invaluable because so often others appear to use difficult and complicated language in their discussion to appear more sophisticated. The source is of scholarly origin and is of a high standard, featuring a detailed reference list.
K. Mark Smith has written an interesting paper that confronts three popular arguments against posthuman enhancements, while noting the pitfalls of these arguments and essentially providing posthuman counter-counter arguments. This is important in the critical response to the statement as a person needs to have an idea of several different arguments to make a fair response. Smith’s engagement of those arguments makes it particularly valuable to my engagement of the essay. Of similar style to Bostrom’s article, it is written in relatively clear language, which is so essential in opening the debate to a wide audience and keeping the potentially complicated arguments simple. Smith’s paper is also well sourced and of scholarly origin, confirming it as a high value source.
Anthony Tongen writes an interesting article on biological computers and if they will ever advance to the stage of being considered human. Tongen has made the point that should scientists accurately ‘map’ the neural and chemical processes of the brain, the technology already exists to build computers operating the same processes. Clearly this article would be a valuable source in responding to the essay question because it helps raise the point that, at least physically, even the most advanced parts of the human body will likely ‘soon’ be able to be reproduced in computers. Will this lead to the creation of a ‘human’ AI? Probably not, given the difficult ethics, but the source is still valuable in exploring these issues. Tongen’s article is not perfect however, as there are some elements that lower the value of the source. The source is becoming dated, being around five years old. Furthermore, Tongen does not include an extensive bibliography in his article, referencing only a few sources.
Andy Miah’s paper argues that transhumanism has so far lacked mainstream support not because it isn’t applicable, but because of the difficulty of applying it in our cautious technological society. He goes on to make that point that the one area in which it has been acceptable in society so far is professional sport. This is important because it raises the point that the nature of elite sports is to push (and perhaps go beyond) the capabilities of the human body. What then, when athletes are no longer entirely human? This paper is clearly of relevance to the essay statement and being of a well-researched scholarly nature, is a high value source.
Although Daniel Nalesnik is not a fully accomplished academic, his paper is still well researched and quite useful in critically responding to the essay question. Naelsnik the views and opinions of several prominent thinkers in the area of posthumanity, such as Fukuyama, Clark, Brooks, McKibbin and Kurzweil. This paper is a great starting point to discover what are the major concerns and themes surrounding posthumanism are, which is of relevance to ‘what it means to be human’. His paper is well sourced and hosted on an academic website, lending it credibility.
Hopefully from the brief webliography above, one can see that any essay critically addressing the statement that ‘From Frankenstein to the Visible Human Project, the body is continually reinterpreted as a limit to what it means to be human’ would be well placed to make a reasonable response. Though I have noted a general swing towards transhumanist views in my sources, the sources above are fairly balanced themselves, making this a smaller problem. If there wasn’t the limit of 5 sources available online, I would have liked to include more sources from the humanist point of view. As it stands, I believe this webliography is a good base from which to firstly form a response, and secondly use as a base for further reading, such that one might be able to critically respond to the essay statement.
references
Bostrom, Nick (2005) In Defence of Posthuman Dignity, http://www.nickbostrom.com/ethics/dignity.html (accessed 28 August 2008)
Smith, Mark K. (2005) Saving Humanity?:
Counter-arguing Posthuman Enhancement, http://jetpress.org/volume14/smith.html (accessed 20 August 2008)
Tongen, Anthony (2003) Will Biological Computers Enable Artificially Intelligent Machines to Become Persons?, http://www.cbhd.org/resources/biotech/tongen_2003-11-07_print.htm (accessed 26 August 2008)
Miah, Andy (2003) Be Very Afraid:
Cyborg Athletes, Transhuman Ideals & Posthumanity, http://www.jetpress.org/volume13/miah.html (accessed 24 August 2008)
Nalesnik, Daniel (2005) Posthumanity: Changing Our Species, http://www.comcol.umass.edu/academics/deansbookcourse/pdfs/F05Nalesnik.pdf (accessed 23 August 2008)
Sunday, August 31, 2008
Guiding Question 2
Webliography
— The Limitations of the Human Body.
While examining the guiding question, the throbbing question that came to the mind was about the capability and limitations of the human body as compared to the cyborg. My first line of action was, while searching for credible online sources of information, to search the UWA library website, specifically the SuperSearch engine. I found several useful articles related to my guiding question, which served as information tool and added to my limited knowledge on cyborgs. With the help of the ‘Google Scholar’ search engine, I found several relevant articles and I was overwhelmed by what I read and was impressed with the information they had to offer.
In her manifesto, Donna Haraway mentioned that “A cyborg is a cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction.” While the body is totally human, a cyborg is a hybrid. This vivid distinction of the human body from the cyborg reflects the limitations of the body, that while the human body experiences pain, such features are non-prevalent in cyborgs.
In “Technologies of the gendered body”, the authors mention that “bodybuilding, coloured contact lenses, liposuction and other technological innovations” have made it possible for changes to happen to the ‘natural’ body. With technological innovations, there came about the possibility of body parts being replaced once they wear way and it also lights the hope of immortality. However, the constant fear of new viruses and diseases which may be borne to eradicate the human body is constantly behind the minds of people. The authors show a wonderful relationship of the body and technology, where the “machines assume organic functions and the body is materially redesigned through the application of newly developed technology.” The cyborg image is read in two ways: “as a coupling between a human being and an electronic or mechanical apparatus or as the identity of organisms embedded in a cybernetic information system.” Hence, while the human body has certain limitations, the cyborg body is free for these limitations and is not bounded in any form, unlike the human body. The article is clear and concise and while sticking to its title, it spells out the limitations of the human body.
This adds to the discussion by Andrea Gaggioli, Marco Vetorella and Giuseppe Riva in their article. “From Cyborgs to cyberbodies: The evolution of Techno-Body in Modern Medicine.” This paper focuses on “the ways in which the introduction of technologies in modern medicine is changing collective notions of the body.” With the advancement in technology and development of new medicine a new path is carved for intervention to the ‘naturals’ of the body. With such new ways of remaking the body, it has “contributed to reshape the notion of the body in the cultural imaginary and to foster a transformation of the collective representation of the embodiment experience.” While the article is focused on the evolution of the techno-body, the authors have cleverly argued that with cyborg modification, it is to the betterment of the physical and mental abilities of the human body.
Nicholas Gane introduced in his journal that in “this age of high technology, in which the human body is no longer tied to ‘nature’ but open to technological modification, has subsequently been termed ‘Posthuman’.” The ‘Posthuman’ is not regarded as advancement but as something that is different from human body and hence, is equated to machinery. He mentions about the current debates “from the basis of cyborg citizenship and the possibility of forging a posthuman democracy through to the politics of nature and the challenge of governing science.” He has cleverly drawn the link between the cyborg, the body and its limitations.
This links to an article from BBC news in 2001 which reveals the possibility of head transplants. It mentions that with medical technology, a transplant on the human body is possible and Professor Robert White, from Cleveland Ohio, “raised the possibility that it could be used to treat people paralysed and unable to use their limbs, and whose bodies, rather than their brains, were diseased.” This newspaper report reveals transplants to a new dimension. However, it also raises moral and ethical issues. This is an easy to read article, revealing such a possibility available in medical science.
According to Rosi Braidotti, “The cyborg, or the companion species, is a connection-making entity; a figure of interrelationality, receptivity and global communication that deliberately blurs categorical distinctions.” She mentions that we need to rethink about the human body as we compare it with the cyborg. She mentions that a “cyberteratological apparatus that scrambles the established codes and thus destabilizes the subject” is termed as “a nomadic device.” She has pointed out the connection between the cyborg and the human body where the body has high dependency on machines.
The human body has several limitations. This becomes obvious with the readings about Frankenstein, the Visible Human project and body transplants. The readings also show how the human body is fully dependent on machines, not only for medication purposes such as the MRI, but also for daily activities like driving.
References:
1)Harraway, Donna. "A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century," in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York:Routledge, 1991, p.149-181 http://www.stanford.edu/dept/HPS/Haraway/CyborgManifesto.html (accessed on 19/08/08)
2) Balsamo, Anne M. Technologies of the gendered body: Reading Cyborg Women, Duke University Press, 1999 http://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=lkr11mXPYKEC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=frankenstein+cyborg&ots=U6OcevyH9i&sig=_p6rb4vncPh-EZW9iRIrSOpSVNU#PPA5,M1 (accessed on 19/08/08)
3) Gaggioli, Andrea, Vetorella, Marco and Riva, Giuseppe. “From Cyborgs to Cyberbodies: The Evolution of the Concept of Techno-Body in Modern Medicine”,PsychNology Journal, 2003, Volume 1, Number 2, p.75 to 86 http://www.psychnology.org/File/PSYCHNOLOGY_JOURNAL_1_2_GAGGIOLI.pdf, (accessed on 19/08/08)
4) Gane, Nicholas. “Posthuman”, Theory Culture Society, 2006, Volume 23, p. 430-434 http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/23/2-3/431.pdf
(accessed on 20/08/08)
5) Braidotti,Rosi. “Posthuman, All Too Human: Towards a New Process Ontology”, Theory Culture Society, 2006, volume 23, pg 197-208
http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/23/7-8/197
(accessed on 20/08/08)
6) Frankenstein fears after head transplant, BBC News, 6 April 2001 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/1263758.stm
(accessed on 20/08/08)
Footnotes:
1)Harraway, Donna, "A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century," in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature ,New York; Routledge, 1991
2)Balsamo, Anne M. Technologies of the gendered body: Reading Cyborg Women, Duke University Press, 1999, p.1
3)Balsamo, Anne M. Technologies of the gendered body: Reading Cyborg Women, Duke University Press, 1999, p.2
4)Balsamo, Anne M. Technologies of the gendered body: Reading Cyborg Women, Duke University Press,1999, p.11
5)Gaggioli, Andrea, Vetorella, Marco and Riva, Giuseppe. “From Cyborgs to Cyberbodies: The Evolution of the Concept of Techno-Body in Modern Medicine”,PsychNology Journal, 2003, Volume 1, Number 2
6)Gaggioli, Andrea, Vetorella, Marco and Riva, Giuseppe. “From Cyborgs to Cyberbodies: The Evolution of the Concept of Techno-Body in Modern Medicine”, PsychNology Journal, 2003, Volume 1, Number 2
7)Gane, Nicholas. “Posthuman”, Theory Culture Society, 2006, Volume 23, p.432
Gane, Nicholas. “Posthuman”, Theory Culture Society, 2006, Volume 23, p.433
8)Frankenstein fears after head transplant, BBC News, 6 April, 2001
Rosi Braidotti, Posthuman, All Too Human: Towards a New Process Ontology, Theory Culture Society 2006; 23, pg 200
9)Rosi Braidotti, Posthuman, All Too Human: Towards a New Process Ontology, Theory Culture Society 2006; 23, pg202
— The Limitations of the Human Body.
While examining the guiding question, the throbbing question that came to the mind was about the capability and limitations of the human body as compared to the cyborg. My first line of action was, while searching for credible online sources of information, to search the UWA library website, specifically the SuperSearch engine. I found several useful articles related to my guiding question, which served as information tool and added to my limited knowledge on cyborgs. With the help of the ‘Google Scholar’ search engine, I found several relevant articles and I was overwhelmed by what I read and was impressed with the information they had to offer.
In her manifesto, Donna Haraway mentioned that “A cyborg is a cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction.” While the body is totally human, a cyborg is a hybrid. This vivid distinction of the human body from the cyborg reflects the limitations of the body, that while the human body experiences pain, such features are non-prevalent in cyborgs.
In “Technologies of the gendered body”, the authors mention that “bodybuilding, coloured contact lenses, liposuction and other technological innovations” have made it possible for changes to happen to the ‘natural’ body. With technological innovations, there came about the possibility of body parts being replaced once they wear way and it also lights the hope of immortality. However, the constant fear of new viruses and diseases which may be borne to eradicate the human body is constantly behind the minds of people. The authors show a wonderful relationship of the body and technology, where the “machines assume organic functions and the body is materially redesigned through the application of newly developed technology.” The cyborg image is read in two ways: “as a coupling between a human being and an electronic or mechanical apparatus or as the identity of organisms embedded in a cybernetic information system.” Hence, while the human body has certain limitations, the cyborg body is free for these limitations and is not bounded in any form, unlike the human body. The article is clear and concise and while sticking to its title, it spells out the limitations of the human body.
This adds to the discussion by Andrea Gaggioli, Marco Vetorella and Giuseppe Riva in their article. “From Cyborgs to cyberbodies: The evolution of Techno-Body in Modern Medicine.” This paper focuses on “the ways in which the introduction of technologies in modern medicine is changing collective notions of the body.” With the advancement in technology and development of new medicine a new path is carved for intervention to the ‘naturals’ of the body. With such new ways of remaking the body, it has “contributed to reshape the notion of the body in the cultural imaginary and to foster a transformation of the collective representation of the embodiment experience.” While the article is focused on the evolution of the techno-body, the authors have cleverly argued that with cyborg modification, it is to the betterment of the physical and mental abilities of the human body.
Nicholas Gane introduced in his journal that in “this age of high technology, in which the human body is no longer tied to ‘nature’ but open to technological modification, has subsequently been termed ‘Posthuman’.” The ‘Posthuman’ is not regarded as advancement but as something that is different from human body and hence, is equated to machinery. He mentions about the current debates “from the basis of cyborg citizenship and the possibility of forging a posthuman democracy through to the politics of nature and the challenge of governing science.” He has cleverly drawn the link between the cyborg, the body and its limitations.
This links to an article from BBC news in 2001 which reveals the possibility of head transplants. It mentions that with medical technology, a transplant on the human body is possible and Professor Robert White, from Cleveland Ohio, “raised the possibility that it could be used to treat people paralysed and unable to use their limbs, and whose bodies, rather than their brains, were diseased.” This newspaper report reveals transplants to a new dimension. However, it also raises moral and ethical issues. This is an easy to read article, revealing such a possibility available in medical science.
According to Rosi Braidotti, “The cyborg, or the companion species, is a connection-making entity; a figure of interrelationality, receptivity and global communication that deliberately blurs categorical distinctions.” She mentions that we need to rethink about the human body as we compare it with the cyborg. She mentions that a “cyberteratological apparatus that scrambles the established codes and thus destabilizes the subject” is termed as “a nomadic device.” She has pointed out the connection between the cyborg and the human body where the body has high dependency on machines.
The human body has several limitations. This becomes obvious with the readings about Frankenstein, the Visible Human project and body transplants. The readings also show how the human body is fully dependent on machines, not only for medication purposes such as the MRI, but also for daily activities like driving.
References:
1)Harraway, Donna. "A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century," in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York:Routledge, 1991, p.149-181 http://www.stanford.edu/dept/HPS/Haraway/CyborgManifesto.html (accessed on 19/08/08)
2) Balsamo, Anne M. Technologies of the gendered body: Reading Cyborg Women, Duke University Press, 1999 http://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=lkr11mXPYKEC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=frankenstein+cyborg&ots=U6OcevyH9i&sig=_p6rb4vncPh-EZW9iRIrSOpSVNU#PPA5,M1 (accessed on 19/08/08)
3) Gaggioli, Andrea, Vetorella, Marco and Riva, Giuseppe. “From Cyborgs to Cyberbodies: The Evolution of the Concept of Techno-Body in Modern Medicine”,PsychNology Journal, 2003, Volume 1, Number 2, p.75 to 86 http://www.psychnology.org/File/PSYCHNOLOGY_JOURNAL_1_2_GAGGIOLI.pdf, (accessed on 19/08/08)
4) Gane, Nicholas. “Posthuman”, Theory Culture Society, 2006, Volume 23, p. 430-434 http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/23/2-3/431.pdf
(accessed on 20/08/08)
5) Braidotti,Rosi. “Posthuman, All Too Human: Towards a New Process Ontology”, Theory Culture Society, 2006, volume 23, pg 197-208
http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/23/7-8/197
(accessed on 20/08/08)
6) Frankenstein fears after head transplant, BBC News, 6 April 2001 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/1263758.stm
(accessed on 20/08/08)
Footnotes:
1)Harraway, Donna, "A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century," in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature ,New York; Routledge, 1991
2)Balsamo, Anne M. Technologies of the gendered body: Reading Cyborg Women, Duke University Press, 1999, p.1
3)Balsamo, Anne M. Technologies of the gendered body: Reading Cyborg Women, Duke University Press, 1999, p.2
4)Balsamo, Anne M. Technologies of the gendered body: Reading Cyborg Women, Duke University Press,1999, p.11
5)Gaggioli, Andrea, Vetorella, Marco and Riva, Giuseppe. “From Cyborgs to Cyberbodies: The Evolution of the Concept of Techno-Body in Modern Medicine”,PsychNology Journal, 2003, Volume 1, Number 2
6)Gaggioli, Andrea, Vetorella, Marco and Riva, Giuseppe. “From Cyborgs to Cyberbodies: The Evolution of the Concept of Techno-Body in Modern Medicine”, PsychNology Journal, 2003, Volume 1, Number 2
7)Gane, Nicholas. “Posthuman”, Theory Culture Society, 2006, Volume 23, p.432
Gane, Nicholas. “Posthuman”, Theory Culture Society, 2006, Volume 23, p.433
8)Frankenstein fears after head transplant, BBC News, 6 April, 2001
Rosi Braidotti, Posthuman, All Too Human: Towards a New Process Ontology, Theory Culture Society 2006; 23, pg 200
9)Rosi Braidotti, Posthuman, All Too Human: Towards a New Process Ontology, Theory Culture Society 2006; 23, pg202
Guiding Question 2
In the quest of finding materials online for the second question, I began by using the Google search machine. From the search results, I further inspected the sources used in the articles found and searched authors and keywords from there. I believe that a critical discussion of this question requires both sides of the argument to be shown. Hence, I searched for articles that had information related to the subject of cyborg and the human body, and then followed by articles that both agreed and opposed the notion.
Satyrs, Frankenstein, Machine Men, Cyborgs
This article, retrieved from the website called World-Information.org, has the scholarly authority of The Institute for New Culture Technologies/Public Netbase from Vienna. It essentially brings about the view that there are many known parallels between man and non-human. In the beginning of the article, the author covers when the idea of the hybrid between the two came about. This aspect of the article would be important as it provides the history of the aforementioned idea which dated back to the time of mythology. The article also provides reasons for the early depiction of ‘half-man half-machine creatures’ such as Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. It also mentions how the non-human world consists of not only ‘animal and divine worlds’ but most importantly, the world of technology. In fact, the article added that even the purist meaning of Man is unclear and is further affirmed by Darwin and Freud’s theories. These pieces of information would hence be useful for the introduction of the essay.
The article published in 2001 by Eugene Thacker was extracted from an online journal called the Culture Machine in the United Kingdom. It talked in depth about the Visible Human Project (VHP) and gave a thorough study on how it is usually done. Having the cadavers to be sliced in cross-sections and transferred to the digital format suggests that each part of the human body is holistic. It also covered important sub-topics such as Issues, History and Consequences regarding the digital anatomy. I would find this useful in my essay as I would be able to compare the digitalized concept of the body as compared to the perception of the regular human body. Thacker also suggested that the VHP creates an exclusive bond between ‘virtual technologies and the body’ (Thacker, 2001, Power and Body). In fact, he also analysed how the VHP brought upon a different version of ‘truth’ in regards to the anatomical body (Thacker, 2001, Power and Body).
Jessica Santone’s article is from the University of Chicago and is written in the winter of 2003. The article provides information and understanding of what I need to know about cyborgs. For example, it mentioned that the cyborg possesses both real and mythical aspects in its existence and pointed out that it could be used as a ‘subject position’ (Santone, 2003). Furthermore, Santone provided the intrinsic connection between Man and machine in a cyborg and how the human interrelates with technological inventions. Consequently, I am able to find out the extent of how the body can be reinterpreted other than being human. One of the important details in the article revealed that the cyborg body was deduced as to being more holistic. This would be essential in regards to the Visible Human Project mentioned in the question.
Imagining the Posthuman: Patricia Piccinini and the Art of Simulation
Kim Toffoletti is an associate lecturer in Women's Studies at Deakin University in Australia. This article was written in 2003 and was taken from the University of Western Australia’s Outskirts Online Journal archive. Toffoletti touched on the works of Australian visual artist Patricia Piccinini to branch out the idea of technoscience and reality. One important aspect of Piccinini’s digital work was of a crafted female model with an equally crafted rat resting on top of the model’s fingers. Toffoletti pointed out that with the aid of the digital imagery, the ‘interconnected biological systems of the human and animal species are made possible’ (Toffoletti, 2003). This is most relevant to my essay as I would be able to distinguish how the body is modified and viewed as something more than human when being digitalized. Toffoletti also compared the accomplished works of Donna Haraway and Paccinini whereby technological determinism was shunned in regards to the idea that machines would be a threat to the human existence. This would make a relevant point in my essay as it showed limitations of the body losing its human aspects.
Grant Gillett is a professor of Biomedical Ethics in University of Otago in New Zealand. He wrote this article in May 2005 derived from the Journal of Medical Ethics. It covers various fictional case studies for readers to critically assess their opinions in regards to technological enhancements such as ‘Head Injury and Neurorehabilitation’ and ‘Personal Upgrade with Micronetworks’ (Gillett, 2005). This would be useful for my essay as there are examples to analyse readers’ opinions regarding the reinterpretation of the body and its modifications. Gillett also observed the issue of what determines the human soul under the sub-header ‘What is a Human Soul?’ It covered the moral and ethical aspects of the human body and whether silicone could ever replace human flesh and blood. This would be essential to the opposing notion to the guiding question.
In conclusion, all five of the online sources provide the understanding of the cyborg manifestation and its relation to the human body. The first two articles covered both Frankenstein and the VHP in detail while ‘Cyborg’ written by Santone gave useful information and perspectives about the cyborg. The last two articles showed arguments about the human body being integrated with cyber technology and also its moral identity.
References
Santone, Jessica (2003) ‘cyborg’ http://csmt.uchicago.edu/glossary2004/cyborg.htm (accessed 25 August 2008)
Thacker, Eugene (2001) ‘Lacerations: The Visible Human Project, Impossible Anatomies, and the Loss of Corporeal Comprehension’ http://www.culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/article/viewArticle/293/278 (accessed 25 August 2008)
Toffoletti, Kim (2003) ‘Imagining the Posthuman: Patricia Piccinini and the Art of Simulation’ http://www.chloe.uwa.edu.au/outskirts/archive/volume11/toffoletti (accessed 25 August 2008)
World-Information.Org (2005) ‘Satyrs, Frankenstein, Machine Men, Cyborgs’ http://world-information.org/wio/infostructure/100437611777/100438658891 (accessed 26 August 2008)
Saturday, August 30, 2008
Webilography: Guiding Question Three
Judy Waczman argues that Donna Haraway's figure of the cyborg has taken on `a life of its own' in popular culture, science fiction and academic writing. I what ways has it been taken on by feminists?
Abstract:
The term “feminist” is an umbrella that covers a multitude of different and often contradictory beliefs and arguments, thus I can only begin to scrape the surface as I explore the various aspects of Haraway’s cyborg [1] which have been embraced and taken up, at least in part, by feminists. In particular I consider the writings of a queer feminist (Esperanza Miyake), a spiritual feminist (Ruth Mantin), a socialist ‘transfeminist’ [2] (Krista Scott), a feminist science fiction writer (Ruth Nestvold), and a post-modern feminist (Alison Caddick).
Key words: cyborg, feminism, Haraway, embodiment, gender
Source One [3]:
This work investigates the compatibility of queer theory with Haraway’s cyborg. Esperanza Miyake relishes in placing her body into a ‘network of power…we are sexy cyborgs released into the screen through words that we click’. She asserts that language is powerful, and can construct realities, however, following all power there will be resistance, and this is where the queer cyborg fits into the scene. Miyake presents the queer cyborg as a near perfect example of Dona Haraways figure, one which insists “on noise, and advocates pollution, rejoicing in the illegitimate fusions’. However, Haraway presents the cyborg as a creature that “has no trunk with bisexuality”. Miyake disagrees strongly with this interpretation and asserts that the queer cyborg has a fluid sexuality, and questions that since bisexuality is an “identitiy that is not an identity, a sign of the certain ambiguity, the stability of the instability”, surely bisexuality can form part of the cyborg culture.
Source Two [4]:
This essay provides the perspective of a spiritual feminist, a woman who sees power in the Goddess, myths and mythology. Up until page 33, the essay is largely irrelevant to the guiding question. She first establishes her context and expresses theories of prominent feminists [5] whom have influenced her. She writes that her challenge is ‘to explore the possibilities which Goddess symbolism and spirituality can offer to feminist strategies, negotiations and alliances’. Though she would like to explore new terrain in cyberspace, and interrogate the relationships between ‘woman’, ‘body’ and ‘nature’, Manin would rather be a Goddess than a cyborg. She feels that the cyborg falls short when it comes to considering ‘questions of identity, identification and unconscious desire’. Historically, “Most manifestations of feminist spirituality seem to presuppose a unified self, the realisation of which is the goal of spiritual journeys”. Manin, however, takes on the part of the cyborg as she questions ‘how can spiritual feminists find new ways to express what they mean by spiritually which recognises the multiple, fluid nature of self’
Source Three [6]:
Krista Scott is the voice of a socialist feminist from the 90’s, and her essay provides both a detailed account of Haraway’s cyborg, and the specific aspects of the cyborg that leave itself open to criticism, in particular Marxist criticism. Overall, Scott expresses an embrace [7] of the cyborg figure, and a call to action [8]. She agrees with Haraway that engaging in “anti-science metaphysics [and] demonology of technology” has the potential to cut feminists off from positive possibilities.
Source Four: [9]
Science-fiction writer, Ruth Nestvold begins her essay by discussing the ‘Pre-Haraway’ fears, making particular references to popular feminist science fiction novels. She states that “criticism of technology has had an established place in feminist theory” and that many writers had a rather simplistic approach in criticising ‘male’ technology, and associating high technology with heirarchy, war and destruction. The birth of Haraways cyborg positively presented technology of the future as a means of freedom from bodily and biological constraints. The reliance of the cyborg on text made allowed identies to be chosen, with biological sex only playing ‘a role if the participants want or allow it to do so’. However, Nestvold suggests that gender, not only a performative character, but is also a ‘basic element in the construction of personal identity’, and in constructing our understanding of others.
Source Five [10]:
Caddick writes from the position of a postmodern feminist, and draws on much of Haraways writings [11] to explore the usefulness of the cyborg figure in relation to medical ethics, and especially reproductive technologies. She positions the cyborg against liberal feminists whom typically dominate reproductive-technology debates. Caddick views the cyborg as a largely impractical tool [12], built on questionable logic and reasoning. Caddick suggests that Haraways textual account of the body as a surface, is lacking, and that one should instead employ ‘contrary forms of being... that co-exist in our personal formation’. These modes of being, embodiment and ‘ties to distinctive forms of social life’ cannot be explained textually. “While she [Haraway] correctly identifies aspects of the new mode of being and convincingly overturns some feminist accounts of the technologies, she far too readily accepts the cyborg nature of our emergent desires”
To conclude, Haraway’s Cyborg has greatly influenced feminism as we know it today. The sources I’ve chosen offer a broad spectrum of attitudes towards both the cyborg, and the path forward for feminism. Most of the feminist writers I looked at have taken on Haraway’s cyborg in some way. The Queer feminist has written herself into the cyborg culture, the Spiritual feminist have become more open to a fluid, multiple figure of self, the socialist feminist has been called to action, and the feminist science fiction writers is taking a less simplistic approach to ‘male’ technology. Providing some balance in answering the guiding question, is Caddick’s critical response to Haraway’s cyborg.
Bibliography:
Source One: Esperanza Miyake, My, is that Cyborg a little bit Queer? (2000) http://www.bridgew.edu/soas/jiws/mar04/miyake.pdf (accessed 20/08/2008)
Source Two: Ruth Manin, Can a goddess travel with a cyborg and a nomad? Feminist Theology in a Post Modern Context, Feminist Theology, 2001, SAGE Publications http://fth.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/9/26/21 (accessed 20/08/2008)
Source Three: Kirsta Scott, The Cyborg, the Scientist, the Feminist and Her Critic, (1997) (http://www.stumptuous.com/cyborg.html (accessed 13/08/2008)
Source Four: Ruth Nestvold, "Male" Technology, Feminist Dystopias and the Promise of Cyberspace (1995) http://www.ruthnestvold.com/cyberspace.htm (accessed 13/08/2008)
Source Five: Alison Caddick, ‘Feminist and Postmodern: Donna Haraway’s Cyborg’ (1992)
http://www.arena.org.au/ARCHIVES/General%20Archive/arena_99-100/haraway.html, (accessed 17/08/2008)
Endnotes:
1.) The Cyborg is a “cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction”- Haraway ‘Manifesto’
2.) Sumach Press: Publshers of dynamic feminist writing with a critical perspective, Fall 2008, http://www.sumachpress.com/transfem.htm
3.) Esperanza Miyake, My, is that Cyborg a little bit Queer? (2000) http://www.bridgew.edu/soas/jiws/mar04/miyake.pdf (accessed 20/08/2008)
4.) Ruth Manin, Can a goddess travel with a cyborg and a nomad? Feminist Theology in a Post Modern Context, Feminist Theology, 2001, SAGE Publications http://fth.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/9/26/21 (accessed 20/08/2008)
5.) Including Carol Christ, Rosi Braidotti, Nelle Morton, Linda Nicholson and Catherine Keller
6.) Kirsta Scott, The Cyborg, the Scientist, the Feminist and Her Critic, (1997) (http://www.stumptuous.com/cyborg.html (accessed 13/08/2008)
7.) “In the same way that we must invite drunken Uncle Louie or mad Aunt Tillie to our wedding because they are related to us, we must invite OncoMouse and 239Pu to our politics because they are our weird extended family of the cyborg age” ~ Scott
8.) “a socialist feminist scientific practice would not restrict itself to nunnish cloistered research, but would engage in a critical discourse around scientific practices and process worldwide, from the electronic sweatshops in Singapore to the hiring practices of science faculties in Western Universities” ~ Scott
9.) Ruth Nestvold, "Male" Technology, Feminist Dystopias and the Promise of Cyberspace (1995) http://www.ruthnestvold.com/cyberspace.htm (accessed 13/08/2008). This paper was originally given at the annual conference of the German Association for American Studies in Hamburg, June 1995.
10.) Alison Caddick, ‘Feminist and Postmodern: Donna Haraway’s Cyborg’ (1992)
http://www.arena.org.au/ARCHIVES/General%20Archive/arena_99-100/haraway.html,(accessed 17/08/2008). This article is an excerpt from a larger essay to appear in a forthcoming book tentatively entitled ‘Multiple Bodies: Postmodern Perspectives on Medical Ethics and the Body’, ed Paul Komesaroff
11.) “A Manifesto of Cyborgs’, ‘Fractured Identities’, ‘Situated Knowledge’, ‘Simians, Cyborgs and Women’
12.) ‘far from the cyborg metaphor offering feminism a creative spur to political activity’ but rather that it represents ‘an impasse for thought and action... far from the adoption of the cyborg encouraging an unlimited reflexivity, it closes off the possibility of asking the questions we most need today’
Friday, August 29, 2008
Late Introduction...
Hi.
I know this is late, but I only recently joined the unit.
My name's Alice and I'm doing Communication Studies.
My favourite website is mibba.com, a Creative Writing network.
I know this is late, but I only recently joined the unit.
My name's Alice and I'm doing Communication Studies.
My favourite website is mibba.com, a Creative Writing network.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)